Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about a controversy among critics towards the life of a famous writer Chevailer, which is a person who writes about famous celebrities during the eighteenth century. The author of the reading believes that the accuracy of Chevalier's writing based on some evidence is somehow incorrect . The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. She thinks that those scripts are pretty reliable and exact.
First of all, the author points out that while living in Switzerland, Chevalier was not that much rich as some people says. It is mentioned that he even borrowed some considerable amount of money from a Swiss merchant for affording the cost for parties and gambling. The point is challenged by the lecturer. She says if Chevalier has not the huge money on hand, it doesn't mean he is poor. Furthermore, she argues that he had so many houses and properties, and selling each of them take some days. For this reason, he would borrow money from someone, and after the property is sold he would repay his debts.
Secondly, the author contends that about the doubt on accuracy of Chevalier records in a memoir between himself and a famous writer Voltaire. The article notes that the accuracy of these conversations is not high because it was written after some years when the conversation actually took place. The lecturer rebuts this argument. She suggest Chevalier wrote down every conversation he made with the Voltaire after each night he came home. She elaborates on this by mentioning that he was a reliable person because he consulting so many famous writers on those times.
Finally, the author states that the critics also questioned the explanation of Chevalier's escape from a prison in Venice. The article establishes that although he asserts about his escape by using a piece of metal to make the escape possible from his prison room, but critics say that maybe some powerful political friends of Chevalier escaped him from the prison . The lecturer on the other hand, posits that friends of Chevalier had more powerful friends but they couldn't escape. She puts forth the idea that based on the old Venice government documents, the Chevalier's ceiling room was repaired after his escape. This explanation proves the claim made by the lecturer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrities'.
Suggestion: celebrities
...ler, which is a person who writes about famous celebrities during the eighteenth century. The auth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ed on some evidence is somehow incorrect . The lecturer casts doubt on the claims ...
^^
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...on some evidence is somehow incorrect . The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 2, column 366, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...lier has not the huge money on hand, it doesnt mean he is poor. Furthermore, she argue...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and properties, and selling each of them take some days. For this reason, he woul...
^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uracy of these conversations is not high because it was written after some years ...
^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n after some years when the conversation actually took place. The lecturer rebuts...
^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
... The lecturer rebuts this argument. She suggest Chevalier wrote down every conversation...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er wrote down every conversation he made with the Voltaire after each night he c...
^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...own every conversation he made with the Voltaire after each night he came home. ...
^^
Line 4, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... critics also questioned the explanation of Chevaliers escape from a prison in V...
^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n of Chevaliers escape from a prison in Venice. The article establishes that alt...
^^
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... his escape by using a piece of metal to make the escape possible from his priso...
^^
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing a piece of metal to make the escape possible from his prison room, but criti...
^^
Line 4, column 368, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...of Chevalier escaped him from the prison . The lecturer on the other hand, posits ...
^^
Line 4, column 461, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of Chevalier had more powerful friends but they couldnt escape. She puts forth ...
^^
Line 4, column 472, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ier had more powerful friends but they couldnt escape. She puts forth the idea that ba...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 22.412803532 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 385.0 270.72406181 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96883116883 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53740717864 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 145.348785872 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516883116883 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 419.366225166 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6763258337 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.65 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 17.0 4.19205298013 406% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0768082592969 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0227546342735 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302115441639 0.0662205650399 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0458708929374 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264245562964 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.