summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard on apes can communicate, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in reading
The reading and lecture both are about animal and their ability to communicate. The reading firmly arose some evidence to support the hypothesis that apes are capable of understanding language and can communicate. However, to solve this conflict that, are these animals really acquiring knowledge? He gives mentions a few criteria and studies to prove the statement.
Firstly passage claim that animals can communicate, just because these animals don't look similar to human, doesn't mean they cannot understand and learn the language. In addition, the researchers who had worked closely with apes, they have provided evidence that gorillas use sign language to show humor, to insult, to threaten and to engage in fantasy play. However, the lecturer counters this point by saying maybe its because animals have an emotional attachment with their owners, so they listen and communicate with them.
The author makes the point stronger by giving more examples .first he mentions about koko, lowland gorilla seems to understand a poem written for her. Second, an adult chimpanzee was raised as if she was deaf by teaching sign language, and she was able to communicate through signs. At last, he mentions a chimpanzee named kanzi was able to communicate using a keyboard of symbols. The speaker articulated that we can say animals can communicate if they pass these test. First of all the signers must be able to use language creatively. Second, they should be able to take turns in conversation and they should be spontaneous. Moreover, they must be able to comment on an interesting phenomenon. But as per studies, apes have not passed these criteria.
Finally, to solve this conflict apes can communicate or not .a neurophysiologist using modern technique MRI, they compare the brain activity of human while communicating and of apes. The result can help us to conclude.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...communicate, just because these animals dont look similar to human, doesnt mean they...
^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ese animals dont look similar to human, doesnt mean they cannot understand and learn t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...rer counters this point by saying maybe its because animals have an emotional attac...
^^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e point stronger by giving more examples .first he mentions about koko, lowland go...
^^
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...his conflict apes can communicate or not .a neurophysiologist using modern techniq...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, really, second, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20132013201 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78474721759 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590759075908 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9126405967 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7058823529 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162222340498 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525884260598 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451823712752 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103649109242 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204705716293 0.0443174109184 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.