Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they oppose specific points made in the reading.
The lecture and the reading both are regarding the influence of the author and poet Gertrude Stein in the history. Whereas the author of the passage suggests that Stein's work was less influential in the history. The lecturer cast doubt on the main points made in the text by providing three reasons.
Firstly, according to the text, Stein's work was simply unclear because she tried to take many concepts from Cubism. She tried to apply these concepts to her writing which made it difficult to understand. The lecturer disputes this point. She explains, Stein had written a poetry in which sound of the word and visual pictures were important and it influenced the meaning of writing. lecturer thinks that Stein's work was massive literacy influence.
Furthermore, the reading states that Stein's work avoided punctuation. Not using punctuation in her writing made it difficult for the readers to decipher Stein's work.
Neverthless, lecturer refutes this argument. She argues some author thought punctuations are unnecessary and it weakens the sentence made by the author. Lecturer believes Stein's work to be unique in this way.
Finally, the reading claims that the fact Stein's regular visits by renowned artists at her home alone does not give her real historical significance. On the other hand, the lecturer believe Stein's work had influenced many artists in her contact and hence she has important siginificance in the history.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lecturer
...d it influenced the meaning of writing. lecturer thinks that Steins work was massive lit...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, regarding, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1219.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27705627706 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61950194621 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549783549784 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8412549383 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2666666667 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122589943974 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581195487738 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695957566133 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782154865953 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398783581003 0.0443174109184 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.