Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage
The lecturer and the author of the passage offer two opposing views on the accuracy of the idea that conducting a project is better in a group than individually. The author of the article elaborating only on positive side of that idea, but the lecturer provides strong evidence from real research to attack each of the claims made in the reading.
Accordingly, to the text first reason why working in a team is the best way is that group members possess more skills than one person, although can use varied resources and perform the project faster than one individual. This directly contradicts what the lecturer indicates. The researchers explain that it was more time consuming for the members to find a common ground on the projects because people tend to suggest a variety of things to begin with. Additionally, some group members were not active participants, the lecturer called them free ride members; they were not working hard but got their recognition though.
The second passage claims that work of some individuals can be very rewarding because some members who had a bigger impact on the implementation of solutions for the project would feel better and could get a possibility to shine among other members. That is the opposite point of view of what was real result of the research. The lecturer addresses that some members of the group had leading position in making a decision or higher influence on the choosing important things or ideas, while others who tried to participate had to listen to the leaders. The professor also states the contradiction results that recognition of the job was assigned to the whole group not a few individuals.
The disadvantages from working in the group outweigh the advantages accordingly to the research results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the whole group not a few individuals. The disadvantages from working in the group...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, second, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77383846563 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55593220339 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5877018761 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.090909091 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.092492444661 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365122016293 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308851155176 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0496788518502 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356339336045 0.0443174109184 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.