Summarize the risk takers articles?
The article states that risk taking is dangerous action, and provides tree reasons for that. However, the professor explains that they are not dangerous and refuses each of the author's reasons.
First the reading claims that universal risk taking personality people takes dangerous risks in their every aspects of life. The professor refutes this point by saying they just take risk some part of their life, such as bankers take risk when they make an investment, and motorcycle driver, or racer take risk on the weekends.
Secondly, the reading connects the risk takers to suicidal tenders. The professor opposes this point by explaining that risk takers never think they will fail, since their skills, and success. They have never failed, so they think they will successfully complete that action.
Third, the article points that there is no reward to take a risk. However, the professor says that there is a reward for the risk takers. According to the professor, there is a chemical, and physical award, for instance a sky divers bodies pump adrenalin, and it is pleasurable for them. Also, physically get benefit, like they have a high self-esteem, and social success. Additionally, we learn that as professor states there are some risks which are foolish to take, like smoking, despite that it does not mean the risk takers are not mentally ill.
- Do you agree or disagree?People today spend to much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather then they should do. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 66
- eco- toruism? 3
- Do you agree or disagree In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 76
- Do you agree or disagree? A person should never make an important decision alone. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...s that risk taking is dangerous action. and provides tree reasons for that. However...
^^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eading claims that universal risk taking personality people takes dangerous risks...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 224.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08482142857 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44117250157 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558035714286 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.51434878587 462% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.8183198782 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6153846154 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2307692308 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261361232824 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11227483606 0.0996497079465 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988861747899 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162209153882 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299377111391 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.