Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, internet means everything to people. We utilize it in every sector, such as commercial, manufacturing, education, governmental records. Government spend too much money for internet, transportation, and also for other investments. There is an argument states that government should spend more on internet access than public transportation. I strongly agree with that statement for two reasons which I will explain on the following essay.
First of all, the reason to be mention is improving community. Todays we provide everything via internet. We give education with internet, we communicate via internet. Even we do not need to go shopping, since we can order our needs to our home. Even big factories can be controlled from home just with a tablet, or laptop. However, the most significant point is education. With no exemption every school uses technology, and internet. For example, teachers sometimes show some interactive videos about the lecture that will keep students attention on to lecture. Also, to make research for professors, they need to do search, and use special software to apply their methods which all of them require internet access. Using internet for education, and science will provide innovations to community, and help them to improve themselves. Thus, I believe government should spend more money on internet access than public transportation.
Furthermore, the second reason is internet also used in transportation. We live in twentieth century, even in every governmental, health, or public transportation internet is used. If government try to improve internet access it will also progress the public transportation, because to observe, and adjust the traffic they use internet. For instance, for the citizens to get their destination they benefit from internet to check the public transportation lines, and times. Hence, from my view of point actually spending money on internet access will also be beneficial option for public transportation.
In nut shell, government should invest their money on internet access instead of public transportation. Internet is used in every systems of the countries. It is used in education, health care, even secret, and critical governmental systems, so spending money for it will help the community keep progressing, also keep the country safety. Additionally, officials use internet to observe, and adjust the transportation in public. To learn how to go somewhere we have to check it on internet to find out which line. In this way, I think internet access should be improved, more compared to public transportation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.0752688172 334% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2206.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47394540943 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15570323273 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508684863524 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 11.0 1.86738351254 589% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.100209278 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7037037037 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9259259259 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85185185185 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.88709677419 307% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386819088993 0.236089414692 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119567563294 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873631806088 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27961799261 0.150856017488 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038736013831 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 58.1214874552 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.85 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.