the positive and negative impacts of the eco torism?
The article states eco-tourism, or the green tourists is entirely a good thing, and provides tree reason of support. However, the professor states all the news have positive, and negative impact. She refuses each point, and explains them.
Firstly, the reading claims that eco-tourism serves as a substitute for the development that would be more dangerous. However, the professor refutes this point by saying, in eco-tourism you exhibit your natural resources, such as forests, but to keep the tourist satisfied, and comfortable you will provide them an accommodation, by building infrastructure. Thus this is also a big damage for the environment.
Secondly, the reading posits that since those areas attract the tourist to keep their attention on them the government will protect them. The professor says, this is not certain. People might do illegal cutting trees, and hunting. There is no guarantee people will not exploit that area.
Third, the author says, from eco-tourism the local people will also, get benefit. However, the professor opposes this point by saying there are more jobs than past, local people will have the less wage. Additionally, we learn that governments can use some of the funds to protect the environment. This is the party all of the sites get mutual benefit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ommodation, by building infrastructure. Thus this is also a big damage for the envir...
^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'big damage'.
Suggestion: big damage
...lding infrastructure. Thus this is also a big damage for the environment. Secondly, the r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve the less wage. Additionally, we learn that governments can use some of the fun...
^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lly, we learn that governments can use some of the funds to protect the environment. This ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...tect the environment. This is the party all of the sites get mutual benefit.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, third, thus, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 30.3222958057 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 208.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25480769231 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73766312232 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620192307692 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.51434878587 462% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.5722200177 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0714285714 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8571428571 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118104619478 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346718839713 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495246368321 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0712757270383 0.162205337803 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479818283834 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.