Sydney Opera House
The article states that the Sydney Opera House was a dramatic concept by Jorn Utzon and but possessed a lot of challenges in construction due to that. The report provides three points to support this. However, the professor disagrees with this and believes it to be a masterwork by the architects and refutes all the points presented in the article.
First, the article states that the Sydney Opera House was a part of an international competition in 1956 among various other international architectural firms and was selected by the committee. The professor disagrees on this and says that the architecture was unique in itself and does not fit in any international category.
Second, the passage states that the design was so revolutionary that the engineers at that time were not capable of understanding. It explains that the head Jorn Utzon himself has to spend several years in reworking the design of the roof. However, the professor explains that the model was an organic design and as natural as a "ship in a harbor".
Third, the article posits that even after a decade after being chosen in the international competition the opera house was not even near completion. However, the professor disagrees on this stating that a lot of engineers collaborated in the project making it possible. She also believes the Sydney Opera House to be a Creature of Computer Age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...was an organic design and as natural as a 'ship in a harbor'. Third,...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, third, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05217391304 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97672127772 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491304347826 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0561334302 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.636363636 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260558255211 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105392628356 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150976088942 0.0662205650399 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172617618093 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111518225633 0.0443174109184 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.