TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task
The reading passage and the lecture are both discuss about the human presence on venus. The passage show three reasons why human cannot survive on venus. Yet, the lecture proposes another three reasons on human can still live on the venus by some substitute methods.
First of all, the reading argues that the atmospheric pressure on venus is ninety times greater than Earth, thus everything that land on the venus will eventually crushed and couldn’t stand by this heavy pressure. The lecture refutes that it can established a floating station above 50 kilometers surface on venus which pressure is equal to the Earth.
Secondly, the reading say that there’s no water reservoir and the low content of the oxygen which may result from human cannot survive without these two important factors, what’s more, the atmosphere of the venus were mostly made up of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric acid which indeed not suitable for human to live. On the flip side, the lecture holds opposite opinion on this issue, we can solve these problems by using other chemical materials.
Lastly, the reading show that sixty percent of sunlight will be reflected back into space owing to the obstruction of those thick clouds and only forty percent can finally get through the clouds in terms of this problem people cannot produce the electricity and face the lack of light. However, the lecture argues that by establishing stations can have the access to get the light.
In short, both of the reading and the lecture had their own perspectives toward this issue, there’s no right or wrong, it all depends on what human think.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'crush'
Suggestion: crush
... that land on the venus will eventually crushed and couldn't stand by this heavy p...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'establish'
Suggestion: establish
...essure. The lecture refutes that it can established a floating station above 50 kilometers ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, in short, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08088235294 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44046765046 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591911764706 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.5751736623 49.2860985944 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.2 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31690876135 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124257469887 0.0996497079465 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502762229151 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162705145975 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608557091995 0.0443174109184 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.