t which annihilated many species. However, finding all ideas questionable and implausible, the professor in the listening by estroyed the food chains of species which lived on the coast. Conversely, the professor disputes this point by clarifiying the fact that land species had the ability to adapt themselves to changes. Moreover, this change was quite gradual asserts that asteroid strike have blocked sunlight for a long time which caused a mass extiction as a last point for supporting that ma
Actually, both the passage and the lecture discus about a huge extinction that happened at the end of Triassic period. Although, the passage brings three hypothesizes for expressing the reason of vanishing of half of all living species, the professor puts those theories under question. According to the professor, none of them are convincing.
First, as the passage mentioned, sea level is counted as a significant factor that cause the extiction. The less sea level, the less creatures which can be survived; however, the lecturer doesn't reinforce the claim by adding the fact that the level of sea was declined gradually; therefore, it couldn't be an effective factor.
Next, as the passage illustrated, weather circumctance influenced the animal and plant population to be eliminated; the global tempreture reduced when sulfur acid dispersed; nevertheless, the professor dismises the idea by emphasizing the fact that the time of presentation of sulfur acid was short enough that couldn't cause extiction.
Finally, the passage asserts the thought that the extinction may accure because of the asteroids' impacts which destroys the environment; on the other hand, the professor doesn't validate the idea by scrutinizing the time of big asteroids which collided with earth. It was about 12 milion years before the considerable extinction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun creatures is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... the extiction. The less sea level, the less creatures which can be survived; howeve...
^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... can be survived; however, the lecturer doesnt reinforce the claim by adding the fact ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...a was declined gradually; therefore, it couldnt be an effective factor. Next, as t...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 312, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...on of sulfur acid was short enough that couldnt cause extiction. Finally, the pass...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 171, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...nment; on the other hand, the professor doesnt validate the idea by scrutinizing the t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 208.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50480769231 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93405942284 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610576923077 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.3895570982 49.2860985944 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.125 110.228320801 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149779332012 0.272083759551 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582575902377 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555011487776 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0835234178962 0.162205337803 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404342065338 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.