In the lecture, the professor makes a series of points that chalenges all the arguments presented in the reading passage. He states that in contrast to the author opinion about policy of making more taxes for unhealthy food and behavior like smoking do not necessary leads to social benefits.
First of all, she refutes the author's claim about discouragement to use that product.She states this policy might push more smokers who want to use it due to increase price to buy lower quality with lower price which could provide more health risk.
Moreover, she contradicts the reading about fairness of increasing tax for unhealthy behavior. She states taking account to the peoples income, increasing tax put more pressure on people with low income than high income and is not fair.
Lastly, she states more revenue for goverment as the reading points out has also downside. She says goverment obtains lots of money by this taxes and depend on it. Therefore they do not implement laws to limit them. For instance, all the preventions that take place during years like not to use smoking in public places would be eliminated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: She
...bout discouragement to use that product.She states this policy might push more smok...
^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...avior. She states taking account to the peoples income, increasing tax put more pressur...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...says goverment obtains lots of money by this taxes and depend on it. Therefore they ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...f money by this taxes and depend on it. Therefore they do not implement laws to limit the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to use smoking in public places would be eliminated.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, lastly, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in contrast, first of all, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 1373.03311258 68% => OK
No of words: 189.0 270.72406181 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95767195767 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45699838703 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634920634921 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.655909362 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2222222222 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113583250587 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522904417211 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691223595141 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738693803623 0.162205337803 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590670376315 0.0443174109184 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.