teamwork
The article and the lecture focus on teamwork as a means to complete projects. The author provides several statements that show the beneficial effect of such a labor organization approach. The lecturer, however, challenges the claims made in the article and points out the negative aspects of teamwork.
The author begins by stating that the advantage of teamwork is access to all team members' knowledge and skills. And as a result, it allows to analyze projects from different perspectives. The lecturer provides counterarguments by mentioning that there could be team members who would stop the productive discussion and impede others to follow their opinion. Thus, not an optimal decision could be made.
Secondly, it is stated in the article that teamwork can facilitate the project, so the tasks will be done quicker. Moreover, the team can come up with creative solutions to issue. The lecturer rebuts this statement. He mentions that in a team inordinate amount of time could be spent just discussing the problem and coming to an agreement.
Finally, another advantage of teamwork is that the team members could get a significant reward. This is because the impact of a project is greater than that of individual work. The lecturer opposes this specific statement. He provides examples in which not all team members contributed equally but all received an equal reward. This imbalance is considered by the lecturer evident disadvantage of teamwork.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... of such a labor organization approach. The lecturer, however, challenges the claim...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ut the negative aspects of teamwork. The author begins by stating that the advan...
^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...ntage of teamwork is access to all team members knowledge and skills. And as a result, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'analyzing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: analyzing
... and skills. And as a result, it allows to analyze projects from different perspectives. T...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26923076923 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85903823725 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57264957265 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4593386628 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0625 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.625 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236722405751 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893043498416 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116757458714 0.0662205650399 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159610560929 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641773167907 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.