The text discusses an advertising tactic which is called Buzzing, and explains how this tactic can be bad for society and consumers. On the other hand, the lecturer who is a part time buzzer states that claims of the text is misleading, and provides some reasons to support the tactic of buzzing.
The article states that most of the consumers do not pay attention to the ads so the companies launch the new strategy to attracts consumers that is well known for "buzzing' also the passage provides reasons for support. however, the professor explains that it's completely unreliable and it gives a lot of misleading impression to the consumers of the goods and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading claims that the person acclaiming the production is received a salary from the selling products company. Therefore that given information about this product by advertisers is totally incorrect and they take an expectation from the false sources. Yet, the lecturer refutes this point by saying that the company doesn't choose the ordinary people instead of a specialist who knows about goods very well.
Secondly, the article posits that people believe all the advertisement through the TV or print and they don't realise being lobbed instead of just investigating. however, the professor says that consumer doesn't believe directly that information even though it's so persuasive. Interestingly, they more intend to ask a lot of question about the product then advertiser gives accurate knowledge.
Thirdly, the reading states that buzzing is the most hazardous to social communication with each other. Since, if you know that buzzers make a misunderstanding you'll probably willing not to trust them. In contrast, the professor opposes this idea by explaining that the product gives them a good impression and they do not think whether is trustworthy or not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...e passage provides reasons for support. however, the professor explains that its comple...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 131, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...lary from the selling products company. Therefore that given information about this produ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s this point by saying that the company doesnt choose the ordinary people instead of a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...sement through the TV or print and they dont realise being lobbed instead of just in...
^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...g lobbed instead of just investigating. however, the professor says that consumer doesn...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...wever, the professor says that consumer doesnt believe directly that information even ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you'll
...ow that buzzers make a misunderstanding youll probably willing not to trust them. In ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, well, in contrast, you know, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2766798419 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87404239194 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596837944664 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4780807665 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.363636364 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0909090909 7.06452816374 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111358332131 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394251827082 0.0996497079465 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0213338321047 0.0662205650399 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643586469537 0.162205337803 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170617328077 0.0443174109184 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.