There is a listening passage in which the lecturer explains global warming causes, and in the reading passage the writer opposes the lecturer’s ideas. Summarize the point made in the lecture, explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the reading.
In this set of materials, the writer and the lecturer discuss about the causes of global warming. They totally disagree with each other. According to the lecturer they are all about human interfere in the atmosphere, although the writer thinks that it is a natural phenomenon. The lecturer refutes the writer’s claims with several explanations and examples.
Firstly, according to the writer the atmosphere’s temperature stages has changed for years. For instance, after ice ages the atmosphere has started to be warmer, but before the ice ages it had been warmer, too. On the other hand, the lecturer states that industry and emission changes in the atmosphere are only at their worse.
Furthermore, in the reading passage the writer indicates that scientist have only been documenting weather changes for last 100 years, and they are not enough to say that global warming is related to human activities. However, the lecturer claims that although the scientist cannot predict future temperature trends %100 accuracy, much evidence point the global warming trend may make the planet unhabitatable. She continues to say that the temperature has increased for 1000 years, but it is now at an alarming stage. Thus, people can be only guilty for it.
Lastly, in the reading passage it is indicated that there is no evidence that shows the relationships between the earth’s surface temperature and technology. On the contrary, the lecturer points out that as a greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide release into the atmosphere to make the earth warm enough for the life, but it radically increased recently. Thus, the temperature of the atmosphere has increased one degree since past century.
All in all, the lecturer totally opposes to writer’s claims. She objects the writer in all aspects and shows us that there is a significantly relationship between industrialization and global warming.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 132, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('relationship') instead of another adjective.
... all aspects and shows us that there is a significantly relationship between industrialization and global wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, may, thus, for instance, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35099337748 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96466922755 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519867549669 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2487804733 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215831623307 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714977820043 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522204390401 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119673659969 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403598630823 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.