Three ways for controlling cane toads in order not to over populate in Australia
Both of the reading and listening discuss whether the methods for reducing the number of the cone toads is useful or not. The reading passage states that following method are helpful. In contrast, the professor rejects all the them by introducing some evidence.
Firstly, the reading passage claims that in order to prevent the cane toad in to fields, it is better the people or government erect a national fence around the country. However, the speaker dismisses this idea by saying that with the building the fence may be the big cane toads are not able to go other side but, the small ones are able to penetrate in to other side and after a while they will start to mate. Hence, this practice helps them increase in the other side of fence. in addition, the eggs of them easily are moved to other side. Therefore, this approach is not feasible.
Secondly, the reading says that with the giving permit to volunteers, they collect these animal because these easily are gathered by hand without any tools for hunting. In contrast, the professor says that they pay attention to gather frogs instead, and this issue is so dangerous.
Finally, the reading passage states that the scientists can be create a certain virus in order to it can decrease the number of these animal without harming to other specious. In contrasts, the professor casts doubt this point. she says that this practice has a lot of consequences .and she says how can they do this action, that is this method is not practical and it causes the other animal destroy. What is more, the ecosystem will suffer from this action.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'them'?
Suggestion: the; them
... In contrast, the professor rejects all the them by introducing some evidence. Firstl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...em increase in the other side of fence. in addition, the eggs of them easily are m...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fore, this approach is not feasible. Secondly, the reading says that with the...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ead, and this issue is so dangerous. Finally, the reading passage states that...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 229, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
..., the professor casts doubt this point. she says that this practice has a lot of co...
^^^
Line 11, column 282, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... this practice has a lot of consequences .and she says how can they do this action...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in addition, in contrast, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78776978417 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33255838771 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521582733813 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3226444096 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0714285714 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0778671424814 0.272083759551 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254009776999 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040964591325 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0473126935325 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275531458407 0.0443174109184 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.