tidal power- integrated task

Both the reading passage and the lecture are about the tidal power as a way to generate electricity. The reading, however, discusses solely the advantages of this source of electricity, while the lecturer concentraces on the drawbacks of its usage.

First of all, we learn from the passage that there are four possible periods of energy production every day. Even tough it might seem as quite enough, the lecturer draws our attention to the fact that this will provide ony a fraction of the needed electricity.

Secondly, the author mentions the way those dams with gates and turbines operate and how they can be adapted to different directions of the water flow. However, the lecturer claims that such dams can be built in a very limited number of locations.

FInally, the reading leaves us with the impression that tidal power is harmless. Notwithstanding, the content of the lecture proves the opporite to be true. To start with, it will certainly change the quality of water due to changes in the amount of mud and salt in it. Accordingly, this will affect many sea creatures and plants. Moreover, fish will not be able to move freely from salty and fresh water and the construction of new dams that would solve this issue is very expensive.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... FInally, the reading leaves us with the impression that tidal power is harmless....
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, first of all, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86448598131 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6290477113 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607476635514 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2362149409 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6363636364 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.075145619947 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363998159257 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07725642946 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.045245366974 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477874780598 0.0443174109184 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.