The article states that a mandatory policy requiring companies to offer four-day workweek is going to be more beneficial for both companies and individuals. The professor explains that reducing the number of working days in a week will not benefit any one and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading sates that four-day work week will increase the companies profit. The professor refuted this point. He states that this policy will cause companies to spend more rather than increasing their profits. For example, companies will hire new workers to compensate for the deficiencies, and these workers will need training programs, offices, computers as well as medical insurances, which is going to be the same for all kind of employees.
Second, the article claims that unemployment rates will decrease if companies followed the four days rule. However, the professor says that it is not necessary for the employers to hire new employees. Simply, They may have the choice to offer overtime or to raise hopes to get the amount of job done in only four days. So, this will not require neither new jobs nor new workers.
Third, the reading claims that workers will have more free time, and that is important for the refinement of their lives quality. In contrast, the professor says that lessening working days have some risks, which may jeopardize the excellence of their lifelong. In addition, they may lose their chances in improving their career or having their jobs stabilize. On top of that, four-day workers will not only be the first to lose their jobs in case of economic crises but also deprive the possibilities of them getting promoted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...working days in a week will not benefit any one and refutes each of the authors reasons...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e or to raise hopes to get the amount of job done in only four days. So, this wil...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, well, for example, in addition, in contrast, kind of, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02898550725 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54807792526 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536231884058 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3010872723 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1428571429 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158538936698 0.272083759551 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677618443352 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864910922743 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114322004939 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469568697608 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.