The reading claims that people are reading less literature which is threatening for the literature and culture and provide three reasons for support. However, the professor says that it is not necessary to read-only literature to enhance culture and refutes each of the author's points.
First, the reading says that reader of books regarding literature, which enhance our imagination and expand our understanding of language, has been declined which might exclude us from important benefits. The professor refutes this claim by saying that it is not necessary to read-only literature to enlighten us. There are other books: history, geography, and science, which is also insightful and increase our thought as well. Nowadays, people are reading these kinds of books which are also beneficial for enhancing human imagination.
Second, the passage posits that, instead of reading literature, many people are now watching television, listening to music which lower the level of culture overall. However, the professor explains that listening to brilliant music and good movies, which are more direct than literature, is also a great way of enhancing culture and enlarging the human mind and thought.
Finally, the author of the passage says that, because of reading less literature, lack of its audience and poor standard of readers, the publishers are unwilling to publish writing related to literature. But the professor says that this not the fault of readers. This is happening because of the complex and convoluted nature of literature which is done by the author intentionally.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, regarding, second, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43724696356 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76523257078 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514170040486 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4419982682 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.090909091 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0113113275809 0.272083759551 4% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00437946894723 0.0996497079465 4% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0138490968152 0.0662205650399 21% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00838918912897 0.162205337803 5% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145305018057 0.0443174109184 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.