TOEFL T P O 47 - Integrated Writing Task
The reading passage casts several doubt on the idea of capability ancient Petrosaurs to possess the power of flighting. However the professor refutes all that reasons and states that they might have the ability of flying and provide serious counterarguments against the reading passage by providing three aspects as listed below.
First, she explains that researchers by obserbing the remind of fossils found out that the Pterosaurs' body was covered by high dense hair as a covering. This caracteristic can be found only in warm blood animals, which want to maintain their body temperature at a constant level. Consequently, Pterosaurs were liky warm animals rather than cold blood animals. It means they could produce a lot of energy, which is in contradiction with the reading indicated.
Second, the professor states that it is true that Pterosaurs had masive bones structure, However, the new research indicates that these bone have unusall light weight because of the hollowness. Their bones are hollow and empty insides, which help to fly conveniently. This point refutes the view stated in the reading passage.
Finally, the lecturer points out that the presence of two powerful back legs enable birds to take off and run on the grounds. However, new research shows that Pterosaurs were able to use four legs to run and take off on any types of ground. For example bats in present day can use their legs and wing to walk on the surfaces and use them as a muscle to take off. In this trend Pterosaurs would have no truble for walking and running and evetually started to fly from the ground. This is another point where the lecturer opposes the passage.
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 80
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. 73
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 70
- If you could make one important change in a school that you attended, what change wouldyou make? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
...aurs to possess the power of flighting. However the professor refutes all that reasons ...
Line 2, column 51, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... explains that researchers by obserbing the remind of fossils found out that the Pterosaur...
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
... indicates that these bone have unusall light weight because of the hollowness. Their bones ...
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...e of two powerful back legs enable birds to take off and run on the grounds. Howe...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, second, so, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9605734767 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59166305895 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591397849462 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1073647763 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8571428571 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.