TOEFL TPO 05 - Integrated Writing Task
The reading and the lecture are both about uses of the great house. The author of the reading provides three theories about the use of the great house. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He thinks that evidence is inaccurate.
First of all, the author points out that according to the first theory these hoses for use as a residence of hundreds of people. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says there was no evidence that hundreds of people lived there. Moreover, he says that evidence of fireplaces was not enough for hundreds of people.
Secondly, the second theory contends that Chaco houses were used to store food for a long period such as grain maize. The lecture rebuts this argument. He says that there were not proof of grains that these houses were used to store food. There were founded remains of big containers.
Finally, the third theory states that houses were used as ceremonial centers. Archeologist, near the house, founded relics of some materials used in ceremonies. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that proofs founded were from other materials such as sand, stone, contraction materials, not ceremonial.
In conclusion, the lecture and the reading are both about Chaco houses and their use. The professor effectively challenges the claims made in the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ories about the use of the great house. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99103139013 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44555424943 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506726457399 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1774452314 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.4705882353 110.228320801 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.1176470588 21.698381199 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28014160084 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892086997125 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088479339894 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14885496326 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830222086828 0.0443174109184 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.3589403974 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.77 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.