Integrated essay
The reading and the lecture are both about reading literature. The author of the reading believes that today people replaced literature with music and movies which decrease reading culture. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. She thinks that decreasing the reading cultures is not a result of music and movies.
Firstly, the author points out that reading books, especially literature stimulate people`s imagination, empathy, and comprehension. It is mentioned that by reading less literature people missing a lot of important benefits which reading provide. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She says that this is not true because there are a lot of other things that stimulate people`s imagination and creativity. She says that there are a lot of quality articles, books, and magazines about science and other things who play a role as literature.
Secondly, the author contends that not reading literature is not the main problem. The major problem is what people reading. The article notes that today people are reading self-help books which are the best sellers with poor content and intellectually demanding. Moreover, instead of reading a good book people watch TV, movies, listen to music and read an article on the internet. The lecturer rebuts this argument. She suggests that there are a lot of novels with good content and literature is not the one which increases the people`s intellect. She elaborates on this by mentioning that music and movies are not wasting of time. They have not lowered the intellectual instead of that they speak more directly.
Finally, the author states that the trend of reading less literature today is a result of not investing and supporting literature writers and of the poor standards of today`s readers. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that the lack of readers is probably results of authors faults.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... movies which decrease reading culture. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ead of that they speak more directly. Finally, the author states that the tren...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26058631922 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78167504393 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469055374593 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0980101191 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1578947368 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94736842105 7.06452816374 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.