dinosaurs endotherm
The reading and the lecture are both about dinosaurs. The author of the reading believes that dinosaurs were endotherm. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. She says that there is not accurate evidence that dinosaurs were endotherm.
First of all, the author points out that one of the evidence that dinosaurs were endotherm is that their fossils were found in polar regions. It is mentioned that endotherm can only survive in polar regions. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She says that polar regions were warmer than they are today. Furthermore, she argues that dinosaurs migrate to warmer regions when was too cold.
Secondly, the author contends that the legs of the dinosaurs were positioned underneath its body such as endotherm. The lecturer rebuts this argument. She says that their legs were positioned underneath its body to support their weight not for running like other endotherms.
Finally, the author states that Haversian canals are characteristic of endotherm. The article establishes that dinosaurs had these Haversian canals. The lecturer, however, posits that had growth rings which were evidence for their growth. She puts forth the idea that endotherm does not have these growth rings.
In conclusion, the lecture and the reading are both about dinosaurs and their evidence that they were or were not endotherm. The professor effectively challenges the claims made in the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...believes that dinosaurs were endotherm. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, as to, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29130434783 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55737932969 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478260869565 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7425782154 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.6111111111 110.228320801 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.7777777778 21.698381199 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360509942643 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135116601011 0.0996497079465 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145980274498 0.0662205650399 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241466346199 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708285543029 0.0443174109184 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 53.8541721854 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.51 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.