Summarize the main points in the lecture, and then explain how they cast doubt on the ideas in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about moon formation. The author of the reading cites three theories about moon formation. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He opposes these theories.
First of all, the author points out that once Moon was a part of the Earth and later in the formation of the solar system they separated. It is mentioned that this probably happened when the Earth was spinning rapidly. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that this theory is not accurate because once the Moon was hotter then the Earth and fission is not possible.
Secondly, the author contends that the Moon was formed at the same time as the Earth. The article notes that the Earth was formed from the nebula of interstellar dust and gas, also, the Moon was a sister planet formed by some of the small parts into one body. The lecturer rebuts these arguments by providing impact hypothesis.
Finally, the author states that the Moon was formed from the debris by an indirect collision between the Earth and other planetary bodies. The lecturer rebuts these arguments by providing evidence that fossil rocks were from different chemical components. Furthermore, he stated that if the Moon and the Earth were formed from the same debris then should be formed more Moons instead one.
In conclusion, the lecture and the reading are both about the Moon formation theories. The professor effectively challenges the claims made in the article, and suggest to keep looking for new theories about the Moon formation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...es three theories about moon formation. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...article. He opposes these theories. First of all, the author points out that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'hotter than'?
Suggestion: hotter than
... not accurate because once the Moon was hotter then the Earth and fission is not possible. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Earth and fission is not possible. Secondly, the author contends that the M...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... the Moon was a sister planet formed by some of the small parts into one body. The lecturer...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts by providing impact hypothesis. Finally, the author states that the Moon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d be formed more Moons instead one. In conclusion, the lecture and the readi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, as for, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93129770992 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38121447801 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496183206107 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 386.1 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4565739405 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.75 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0700638588336 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032353233768 0.0996497079465 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382904032735 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0452543801236 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396096436988 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.