Summarize the main points in the lecture and then explain how they cast doubt on the ideas in the reading passage.
The article states that there are a lot of schools providing online degree programs, but in some cases, they are totally different from on campus courses. However, the professor made several points that refute each of the author’s reasons.
First, the author explains that during the online courses, professor and the students couldn’t see each other face to face. According to the lecture, the professor claims that students can choose the traditional campus courses. If they get online degree, they have an option to communicate with their teacher through email, chat, call conferences so on.
Second, the article asserts that online course assignments are tended to be graded by junior workers while senior faculties give feedbacks on-campus homework. However, the professor explains that both programs must demonstrate same standards for accreditation. The professor provides an example, which students from 20 programs reported that online courses are more difficult than on-campus one. Because online degree requires students to be more self-disciplined and offers them great time management.
Third, according to the reading, top universities are not available for online, but the lecturer opposes this idea by saying “it’s not true”. Using the example of top schools, He indicates that all top universities including Princeton offer online graduate degrees.
In a word, according to the lecturer theory emphasis that students can get same knowledge and courses through the online degree program.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71179039301 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84031512675 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624454148472 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.0017360426 49.2860985944 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.0 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0723456012624 0.272083759551 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0271919105852 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0245390582809 0.0662205650399 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0430015818632 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159886716063 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.2367328918 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.