Project work in group
The article asserts that the best way to handle new projects would be collect a group of people into a team. The professor refutes it by presenting recent two companies studies show the opposite results.
First, the reading states that all team member have a broad knowledge, different skills and various experiments that could lead the group project into success. Also, a group can work efficiently and spend less time to accomplish the arising ideas and problems. However, the lecturer opposes that every group member didn't participate in discussion and contribute their solutions and it takes long time to build the main idea. He mentions that it is tough to keep moving forward with plenty ideas.
Second, according the article, playing an important role in group process can be rewarding and it offers them great opportunity to be named as highly contributed member.
On the other hand, the speaker claims that actually it is hard to remember whose idea it was or who did really good job. Group people usually tend to drop each other’s discussion or ignore the coming up ideas all the time.
Finally, the professor explains that it is challenging to be influential, and the group projects never works.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 316, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ecturer opposes that every group member didnt participate in discussion and contribut...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, however, if, really, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 202.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0297029703 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57166663231 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.673267326733 0.540411800872 125% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3170879872 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307551223426 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104662127592 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883702450008 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152955639511 0.162205337803 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831985962731 0.0443174109184 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.