TOEFL TPO 08 - Integrated Writing Task
The passage describes the Chevalier is a controversial figure with a valuable historical memoir. The importance of the book is because of the Chevalier's meeting with many famous people. Also, the passage says this book is not a reliable book and provides three reasons for supporting the idea. However, the talk rejects all these reasons by stating this book is very reliable.
First, the passage says that this person spent a lot of money for gampling and participating in parties. So, the passage claims that if the man was wealthy he did not need to borrow money from a merchan. On the other hand, the professor rebuts this idea by explaining that Chevalier do not want to wait for preparing his cash money. So, he decided to borrow money and it is a convincing theory.
Second, the text contends that it is clear that Chevalier had conversations with a popular writer. But there is a doubt in the accuracy of these conversations. How it was possible for Chevalier to write these conversations in detailes. However, the professor confirms the accuracy of these conversations by stating that Chevalier wrote every night all the details of his conversation with mentioned writer. Furthermore, he kept all his notes and eventuallu used them for his memprie.
Third, the reading claims that it is impossible that Chevalier could escape from a prison by digging a hole with just a piece of metal. Also, the passage states that he had many friends that could helphom. While the professor rejects this theory by describing that the accuracy of Chevalier's escape is verifyed in another reliable document. Also, the professor adds there were other prisoners in the jail that have more friends and they could not be free from the jail. So, how Chevalier could? As you can see, the text's reason is vot believable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 206, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he had many friends that could helphom. While the professor rejects this theory by de...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89250814332 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70603475823 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498371335505 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1496624578 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0526315789 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1578947368 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57894736842 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376692601357 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115934304387 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586851036037 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21609061898 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512095420867 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.