tpo 03-integrated writing
The passage discusses a painting that belonged to Rembrandt. But there are shadows in this subject. So, rext provides three reasons to prove this painting is not on of the Rembrandt's painting. I ncontrast, the lecture refuses these reasons by stating that this painting is definietly belonged to this painter. Consequently, the professr prepares three reasons to support her idea.
First, the text claims that there is something inconsistent about the woman's clothes. The passage describes that the woman in the painting has worn a white linen cap that usually weared by servants and it is in contrast with her fur collar. However, the teacher explains that the painting's pigment analysis show that the real painting is without the fur collar and the fur collar had painted jus for increasing the painting value. So, the professor confirms that the real painting withou fur collar is belonged to mentioned painter.
Second, the article contends that the painter was a master of shadow. But this thechnique does not use very well in the painting. So, there is a doubt about that this painting is belonged to R emnrandt or not. While, the teacher describes that by removing the fur collar from the painting we can see the real color of the dress and that color matches with the light and shadow that there are in the painting. As a result, this painting is related to mentioned artist.
Third, the reading says that all of the Rembrandt's paintings are painted on a single wood panel. While in this painting the artist had used from several pieces of wood. The teacher explains that afraud uses these peices of wood for making the painting more valuable and it is not a big deal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 30, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...d artist. Third, the reading says that all of the Rembrandts paintings are painted on a s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ngs are painted on a single wood panel. While in this painting the artist had used fr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, second, so, third, well, while, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44656434277 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486111111111 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 402.3 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3317939912 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8823529412 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.43889938334 0.272083759551 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15334702847 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870903353422 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282939258378 0.162205337803 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434615775782 0.0443174109184 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.