The reading and lecture both discuss the possibility of life on venous surface. While the reading states three limitations of life on venous surface, the professor refutes that, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading states the pressure is very high on venous. So, everything will be crushed. As a result, people can not live over there. However, the professor questions this notion by saying that they can stablesh floating station like balloon on high atmosphere. In addition, the atmosphere pressure at high location is lower than the pressure on surface area. Consequently, the pressure will be normal as earth pressure.
In addition, the article avers that there is no water or oxygen supply on venous surface. On the other hand, the professor argues this idea by explaining that the venous atmosphere contains carbon dioxide and sulforic acid. So, we can get water through these chemical substances. As a result, there is no need to import them to the venous.
Lastly, the reading mentions that the clouds block the sunlight to get into the venous. So, it will be impossible to generate electricity. Nevertheless, the professor rejects this idea by pointing out that the clouds above 50 colimeter are not thick enough to block the sunlight. Furthermore, the sunlight can go through the cloud and reach the venous surface. Moreover, the clouds can reflect the sunlight. So, the power cells can get enough sunlight to generate the power station.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14049586777 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62694241396 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528925619835 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5458043227 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.1111111111 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4444444444 21.698381199 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235457567798 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806803263682 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404535848874 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136188929296 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505716461285 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.3589403974 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.94 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.