Toefls ibt test1 Writing Integrated 1
The passage and lecture both talk about whether dinosaurs are endotherms(animals who keep their body temperature constant all the time) or not endotherms. The passage strongly puts forward three major theories to prove that dinosaurs must be endotherms. But the lecturer refutes the theories and presents alternative perspective to prove that dinosaurs might not be endotherms.
First of all, the author of passage presents the fact that dinosaurs bones have been discovered in the polar region. This implies that dinosaurs must have lived in polar regions and since polar region is extremely cold only animals that can keep their body temperature can survive in such conditions. This provides evidence that dinosaurs must have been endotherms. But the lecturer contrasts this by presenting another theory that in the era of dinosaurs, the polar region might have been much more warmer than they are now. She also presents another idea that maybe dinosaurs used to migrate away from polar region in winter.
Furthermore, the author talks about the position of legs in dinosaurs. From the study of fossils, it is clear that the legs in dinosaurs were positioned underneath their body. This is the case for most modern endotherms. So, dinosaurs must be endotherms. Here, the lecturer argues that the position of legs might be in order to support the huge weight of dinosaurs. Since dinosaurs grow huge in size, the position of legs underneath the body provides benefit to them.
Finally, the author presents another fact that study of fossils of dinosaurs prove that they have dense Haversian canals present in their bone structures which indicates that they must have been endotherms since most endotherms have this canal today. Here, the lecturer agrees that dinosaurs have the Haversian canals present in their body.However the study of the canals show that the growth of dinosaurs was not consistent with time. This might mean that maybe dinosaurs grew slower in cold climate and faster in warm climate. Since endotherms tend to show fast growth, the study of the Haversian canals indicates that dinosaurs might not be endotherms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'warmer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: warmer
..., the polar region might have been much more warmer than they are now. She also presents an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 388, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: huge
...ight of dinosaurs. Since dinosaurs grow huge in size, the position of legs underneath the bo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 341, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... Haversian canals present in their body.However the study of the canals show that the g...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 341, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... Haversian canals present in their body.However the study of the canals show that the g...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, may, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 344.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24709302326 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59700913802 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436046511628 0.540411800872 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0465129108 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.277777778 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.