Torrey plant survival supported by article and opposes by professor in lecture.
The article is about the Torreya taxifolia, an evergreen tree that now is endangered. So, to prevent it from extinction the author has mentioned a few solutions. However, the professor in her lecture states that none of the solutions would prevent extinction.
To begin with, the article states about the first solution is, that Torreya should be grown in the same location in which it was thriving that is microclimate. The author states that it has a cold temperature and the Torreya could again grow similarly. However, the professor is not satisfied with this solution and stated that it will be unlikely to succeed because of changes in the environment. Global warming has much influence on plant growth, also the wetlands are declining, and getting drier. So, the idea of changing to microclimate would not help much.
To move on to the next solution, the author states to move the Torreya to a different location and this migration will help to grow in a new location that is in the north where the temperature is much cooler. The professor again completely disagrees with this solution and to explain her point, she uses an example of the Black locust tree. It was migrated to another place for its growth but this migration lead to bad consequences. Its growth of it becomes so rapid that it killed other animals and led to other endangered species to extinction.
Another point mentioned by the author is Torreya should be shifted to the research center. In this way, they get proper protection, sampling, and close monitoring. The professor sees flaws in it and stated that in the laboratory there would be exposed to disease and as these trees are not exposed to such an environment, their survival would be difficult. Further, she added that the care of such a number would be difficult and less care makes their survival in the research center difficult.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, similarly, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8934169279 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67390585215 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495297805643 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4832420985 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5625 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6875 7.06452816374 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100127212255 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315559936236 0.0996497079465 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036748949362 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654722436097 0.162205337803 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331450900226 0.0443174109184 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.