torreya plant
The lecturer, as well as the reading, are about some solutions to avoid Torreya plant will become extinct. The reading states that there are three ways to allow Torreya plant to survive. In contrast to the reading, the professor suggests that using either of these ways, it would be impossible to get good outcomes. The lecturer supports her argument by providing some reasons.
First of all, the reading claim that if the Torreya is reestablished in the same location, it would be a great solution for this native area. However, the lecturer refutes this point. She says that with the current global warming, the overall temperature is increasing. Thus the microclimate will not get as they think. Furthermore, she points out that some wetlands have been drained.
Secondly, according to the reading, another option is moving this plant to a different location, further north. Nevertheless, the lecturer disputes this argument. She argues that there is a case where some scientists moved a black locust tree to another region, but it will not work since this plant began to kill other native plants. In addition, she mentions that it will be so difficult to obtain success in this case.
Finally, the reading states that this plant can preserve in research centers. Nonetheless, the lecturer believes that Torreya will not prevent some diseases since this plant needs a large area to prevent it. She says that the research centers will not have the capability to maintain inside.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... the overall temperature is increasing. Thus the microclimate will not get as they t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in addition, in contrast, as well as, first of all, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08163265306 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54729850939 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559183673469 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6385938976 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8125 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3125 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25934840392 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864926201989 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11984799162 0.0662205650399 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17232190641 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098476654359 0.0443174109184 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.59 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.