The article and the lecture are both on memoir of Chevalier. The critics in the reading has put some confusions about the accuracy of Chevalier memoir. In the lecture, the professor argues against the critics with strong evidence to make the arguments of the author fallacious. The reasons provided by the professor in the lecture is given below.
According the passage, the critics assigned Chevalier as a poor person although Chevalier claimed in his memoir that he was an wealthy man. This specific argument of the critics is challenged in lecture. He claims that Chevalier had a lot of properties and he had to go through a process to sell these properties. In between these selling, Chevalier had to borrow money for spending at the party. The professor asserts this to show the wealthiness of Chevalier.
Secondly, The article stated the critics belief on Chevalier writing in the memoir as skeptical one. They think that the writing cannot represent the right phrases of conversation because large amount of time has been passed during the writing and conversation. The lecture, however, depicts that Chevalier writes every day conversation in his diary at the end of the day. The witnesses confirmed this process. This refutes the critics assertation on the confusion of accuracy in Chevalier writing.
Finally, The author rebuts the story of Chevalier escaping from the prism. They believe that Chevalier makes that story only to give pleasure to the reader and he manages to escape from the prism by bribing the jailers. In contrast, the lecture stance is supportive on the story written in the memoir. The professor mentions that other prisoner was not able to escape from the prism by giving bribe to jailers although the had very good relations with the then powerful people. In addition, the authority of prism had to repair the ceiling of the Chevailer's used room. This adheres the Chevalier story of escaping from the prism.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 125, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...alier claimed in his memoir that he was an wealthy man. This specific argument of ...
^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'critics'' or 'critic's'?
Suggestion: critics'; critic's
...lier. Secondly, The article stated the critics belief on Chevalier writing in the memo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 30.3222958057 191% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04347826087 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61736212019 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496894409938 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8746428554 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95 7.06452816374 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179203203554 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557491756196 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599905685982 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109854816073 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395588333991 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.