TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task
The reading and the lecture are about 4-day employment. Whereas the reading states that it benefitial for companies and employies, the lecturer suggests that it is harmfull for both of them in long run. The lecturer casts doubts on the cliams made in the article by providing a couple of reasons.
First of all, the reading contends that 4-day employment raise companies' benfits. However, the lecturer refutes this argument. He points out that it does decreases benefits because more people should work for company and more employies means more money for medical insurance and training. Furthermore, he mentions that more employies need more place and computers.
Secondly, according to the article, this concept reduces unemployment rate. Nevertheles, the lecturer disputes this point. He believes that companies will expect more from these employies.
Finally the reading claims that this kind of employment increases life quality. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that this sort of employment causes several risks such as job stabality reduction. He puts forth on the idea that 4-day employment causes people not to be promoted.
In conclusion, the reading and the lecture are about 4-day employment. But the lecturer effectively chalenges the reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ll expect more from these employies. Finally the reading claims that this kind of em...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, in conclusion, kind of, sort of, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 197.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47208121827 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67618141595 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593908629442 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6817787865 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.8666666667 110.228320801 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.1333333333 21.698381199 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133714265044 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427704030241 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390061160459 0.0662205650399 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702316848742 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373073863157 0.0443174109184 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.56 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.