The professor in the lecture doesn't think that allowing the option of four-day job could help increase the company profits, reduce country's unemployment rates, and render more happiness for individual employees.
Firstly, unlike the passage said that the company payroll cost would be the same, the company would increase their cost. Consider the individual employee. If company hire more employees, it must pay more money to training the green birds. Meanwhile, the employers must cover more medical costs for their increasing employees. In that case, the profit maybe even decreases.
Secondly, employees also have many other difficulties that lead them less rested and alert. For example, the employers may pay more expectations on them because of the less working time. The former may hope these employees perform more efficiently, even finish the quantity of work as same as before. Then, the faults may become more unforgivable. Such pression may lead the employees feel stressful.
Furthermore, except the pression on their jobs, these employees have other risks. They may lose the expected ability to the work because the less time they paid on it, which may be harm to their career. In other words, the chances are that they may lose their jobs because their poor preformation. In such case, their life cannot be happy, too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
The professor in the lecture doesnt think that allowing the option of four-...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25581395349 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50875805033 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8741828558 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.3333333333 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390629761974 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111993724036 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711616968111 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21158583245 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342151791588 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.