In this set of material, both, lecture and the reading passage are discussing about job rewards. Nevertheless, listening and the reading passage are completely contradictory. Whereas the reading passage put forwards the view that job rewards are positives stimulation to improve the worker performance, the lecture argued (or “s”) that it could spoil the productivity.
First of all, the reading cast doubt on the information in the listening passage due to the fact rewards could improve productivity because its motivational effects and at the same time it could to persuade employs to achieve results. The reading present several ways to give rewards, such us, money, luxury vacations, promotions, and so far. The reading supports the point of view through business handbooks, which reveal methods to give rewards and how these are related with a high performance and productivity.
However the listening passage develops the claim that rewards is not an adequate way to increase the productivity. In contrast, with the mentioned in the reading, the listening mention the worker do not like to be rewarded, in fact, they only expect respect and receive a fair payment for an extra job. Furthermore, many studies show how the rewards could cut the productivity and when the people do not receive a reward often are disappointed or punished, also manipulated rather than appreciated by their effort when they get the reward. In another hand, instead of working as collaboration with the supervisor the relation ships experiment damage, as result from this, the quality decreased.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nt several ways to give rewards, such us , money , luxury vacations, promotions, ...
^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...al ways to give rewards, such us , money , luxury vacations, promotions, and so f...
^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rds, such us , money , luxury vacations, promotions, and so far. The reading supp...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...high performance and productivity. However the listening passage develops the clai...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, nevertheless, so, whereas, in contrast, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.372 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96874995856 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1206060572 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.3 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.076165635784 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0282001151748 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0243806238947 0.0662205650399 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0488746189525 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317175137211 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.