Both the reading and the lecture discuss the consequences of a company's strategy regarding the reduction of work hours in order to reach some goals. The author brings up three different reasons to argue that proposed strategy will be useful. However, the lecturer clearly disagrees with the mentioned idea in the text and refutes each of the author's reason.
First, the article claims that not only the cumulative profit of the company will be increased due to the reduction of paid salaries but also the society will see a significant reduction in the unemployment rate. According to the reading, there will be a vacant position for a new person when an employee will work just 80 percent of predefined rate. On the contrary, the lecturer casts doubt on this opinion by explaining that the company has to pay the total of employee’s health insurance without considering work hours.
Second, the reading posits that company will be able to add some new employees and the rate of unemployment will be reduced subsequently. However, the lecturer contradicts the idea and thinks that, with the hiring of new employees, the cost of training and additional computers will cut the company’s profit as well. So, the current jobs will become unpleasant due to companies expectation against its employees.
Finally, the article says that the reduction of work hours will provide more time for employees. But, the lecturer thinks that four-day work per a week will present some risks to employee's life and a reduction in quality will be observed. Also, there will not be an opportunity for improvement in their careers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, well, as to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0861423221 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80326007602 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546816479401 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3425437142 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.166666667 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295905462136 0.272083759551 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116715764267 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688381970216 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189324325315 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839089440995 0.0443174109184 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.