The lecture explained that the option which allows employees to work a four-day week for four-fifths of their normal pay is not benefic as what the reading passage stated. There are three following reasons.
First of all, according to the lecturer, the profits of the company do not change whether the employees decided to take four-day week or five days a week because the company must hire a new employee at the 80 percent rate. Furthermore, it will buy new computers and new office desk. so These additional costs will reduce the profit. This directly refutes the reading passage which states that company profits will increase because only 80 percent of payroll will be paid without no more staff.
Secondly, sometimes, company does not hire more staff and the employees must do same work in four days instead five day. In addition, the company can offer them to take overtime instead hiring because new employee must be trained. So this option has no effects to unemployment rates. This contradicts again what it states in the reading which states this option would reduce unemployment rates when the company hire new employee who will help them in their tasks.
Thirdly, having more time free by the option of working a four-day workweek is a big rick for employees because it reduces their job abilities and they can easily lose their job. In addition, they are less chance to be promoted and evolved in their career because only a person who works very hard is promoted. This highlights the big rick which is not mention in the reading passage which only stated about advantages of spending time with their families.
In conclusion, the option of working a four-day workweek for four-fifths of the normal day is sometimes risky for the employee. So employees must think very well before choosing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... buy new computers and new office desk. so These additional costs will reduce the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93790849673 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43812094958 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5891234151 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.733333333 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.56035990898 0.272083759551 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171485167914 0.0996497079465 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113559358172 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317225358375 0.162205337803 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299385723102 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.