Both the passage and lecture are discussing employees desire for work in the US. Some people prefer to work five days a week, but others prefer it to be only four days a week. The writer thinks that it is better to work four days a week because that will give profits for the employees and companies. The professor, on the other hand, is against this idea. He thinks that working four days will be worse.
At first, the writer claims that when people work only four days that will bring some economic profits for the company. It requires the company to pay the employees only 80% from their normal payments. In contrast, the professor is against this idea because that will force companies to spend more money when they need new workers, health costs and more space and computers.
Second, the writer believes that when employees shortened the workweek, they will increase the company profits and qualities because when they rest and feel relaxed with their works, that might encourage them to make fewer mistakes what will enhance the company profits. The professor, in the lecture, says that when companies find working four days is the same as working five days, they will prefer to have fewer workers for fewer days because that will be economical. Therefore, the qualities will decline.
Finally, the writer says that shortening the workweek will give employees more free time to be with their families. Moreover, they will have a chance to improve their qualities. On the other hand, the professor claims that when employees have more time, they risk to reduce their qualities as long as they out of work with their families. In addition, they might lose their jobs for the same reason.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both the passage and lecture are discuss...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat working four days will be worse. At first, the writer claims that when pe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... costs and more space and computers. Second, the writer believes that when em...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fer to have fewer workers for fewer days because that will be economical. Therefo...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erefore, the qualities will decline. Finally, the writer says that shortening...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'risk reducing'.
Suggestion: risk reducing
...hat when employees have more time, they risk to reduce their qualities as long as they out of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, moreover, second, so, therefore, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86206896552 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20710128361 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455172413793 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 408.6 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8922888755 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431907267284 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16560209681 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837367567356 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291949075652 0.162205337803 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252622148415 0.0443174109184 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.