TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages.
The passage and the lecture are presenting contradicting point of views about team work.
First, the passage indicates the benefit to make team work as it is time-saving thanks to the number of people taking part in the project and the diversity of skills they possess. However, the lecturer qualifies this argument illustrating a company’s team work project that was really long to launch due to the high number of meetings necessary to find an agreement between all the project workers.
Moreover, the passage suggests the interest of team work in the ability the workers have to participate and give their opinion. Nevertheless, the lecturer disputes this theory highlighting the influence that one or two workers can have on others.
Besides, the passage puts the emphasize on the ability of a team to make emerge more creative ideas and take risky decisions to enhance the project. This is another part where the lecturer challenges the passage showing that the influential people are likely to decide about the ideas presented and therefore it alleviates creativity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n others. Besides, the passage puts the emphasize on the ability of a team to make emerge...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, really, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 1373.03311258 66% => OK
No of words: 174.0 270.72406181 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24712643678 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79929897987 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 145.348785872 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580459770115 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6777196568 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.428571429 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256610634456 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12068848766 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420861941455 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148602923652 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031813276372 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.