TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so.

Essay topics:

TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so.

The passage illustrates the benefits of a four- day week job trough three reasons that the lecturer contradicts.

First, the passage indicates that promoting an 80 percent job for employees would improve their comfort and well-being at work which would increase workers’ productivity and therefore profits of the company. However, hiring new employees to compensate the missing work has a cost on companies as the lecturer maintains because they will have to spend money on training and office supplies as computers.

Secondly, the passage shows a benefit for the country as this shortened workweek allows to reduce unemployment in the country thanks to companies hiring more workers. Nevertheless, the lecturer qualifies this theory as companies will tend towards more expectations towards their four-day week employees and therefore, no more jobs will be created. The lecturer goes further indicating that four-day workers could even lose their job because their job ability would be reduced and consequently, companies will be more afraid of promoting them and they would be the first to be fired in case of an economic plan.

Finally, the passage put the emphasize on the enhanced quality of life of workers adopting this schedule: they can spend more time with their family and chasing their personal interests. However, the lecturer contradicts the passage presenting different risks about this work model: employees earn less money and consequently, it alleviates their quality of life.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reducing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reducing
...untry as this shortened workweek allows to reduce unemployment in the country thanks to c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 26, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...omic plan. Finally, the passage put the emphasize on the enhanced quality of life of work...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48068669528 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79697960628 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557939914163 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.5727178748 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.625 110.228320801 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.125 21.698381199 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06452816374 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454874976007 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190744305223 0.0996497079465 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861949339403 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25719596776 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1309037298 0.0443174109184 295% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.3589403974 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.1 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.