The article discusses about the best way to approach certain new project is to assemble a group of people into a team. The professor, however, indicates that working as group in a certain projects is not as effective and efficient and not convincing and refutes of the author's reason that explains on following reasons.
First, the article claims that working as group can gain a wider range of knowledge, expertise and skills that the group can get the recognition, whereas, the professors refutes the idea. He states that the teams will turn unresponsible and after 6.months after the group won't be get any recognition. He, also states that every team has the free rides the one who contribute the idea won't get the recognition, instead the group will get the recognition.
Second, the article claims that when working as group the work will much more done quickly in response to the tasks assign that consider as highly created work. The professor rejects the idea. He explains that the person who contribute the idea will get less the recognition in which he/she will show attitude because he/she get the credit, the group get the credit from his/her contribution of ideas.
Third, the article suggests that when working as group if the decision is wrong, as a whole the group will take the responsibility and will be accountable and no one to be blame if the decisions turn out wrong, the contributor of the idea will get the chance to shine and the ideas will highly recognizable that will result to a greater impact to accomplish the work done, however, the professor, opposes the idea and sounds not convincing. He explains, that if the project didn't work out fine it will turn out making the project for a prolong time and never finish the work on time that will end up dropping the project. He concludes that the group will end up blaming the whole group. That's why the professor refutes the reasons on the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fessors refutes the idea. He states that the teams will turn unresponsible and af...
^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...et any recognition. He, also states that every team has the free rides the one wh...
^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gets'.
Suggestion: gets
...e/she will show attitude because he/she get the credit, the group get the credit fr...
^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e suggests that when working as group if the decision is wrong, as a whole the gr...
^^
Line 7, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o accomplish the work done, however, the professor, opposes the idea and sounds n...
^^
Line 7, column 477, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ncing. He explains, that if the project didnt work out fine it will turn out making t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 537, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...it will turn out making the project for a prolong time and never finish the work on time ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 690, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...up will end up blaming the whole group. Thats why the professor refutes the reasons o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 334.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7994011976 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53558877608 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461077844311 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.912918983 49.2860985944 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 133.583333333 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347445300738 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134932172413 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762986359544 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217884671404 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252138817668 0.0443174109184 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.