The article states that in many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team and provides reasons of support. However, the professor exemplifies what a disaster after six months happened to a company when it decided to turn over some new projects to teams. The professor refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the article claims that since the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all the members, it is more likely to make risky decisions and thereby come up with more creative solutions to problems and issues. However, the professor contends that there are sometimes influencers inside each group that may want to put their own definition on the project and cause deviations from the project's correct direction and even cause the project to go nowhere.
Second, the reading states that taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members of the team. Of course, the group members feel better about their work when they have been given the right to have a voice in making decisions within the group. the professor refutes this point by stating that waiting for an overall agreement among all the group members can prevent the project from moving very quickly. Indeed, it took so long for some group to reach an agreement in making decisions and about how the project should move.
Third, the reading avers that the group members have better chance to shine, to get their contributions and ideas recognized as highly significant because a team's overall results can be more far-reaching and have a greater impact. The lecture opposes this point by saying that the company's groups-evaluation revealed that almost all the team's some members didn't contribute much at all, but if the group did well, they nevertheless benefited from recognition the team got. He adds that the names of the group members who worked well and created many great solutions for project problems and issues remained unknown and recognition for a job well done went to a group as a whole. If we ask the real contributors about how they feel when they encounter this issue, we will see their attitude is just opposite of what the reading has predicted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'spreads'' or 'spread's'?
Suggestion: spreads'; spread's
...the article claims that since the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e in making decisions within the group. the professor refutes this point by stating...
^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a team' or simply 'teams'?
Suggestion: a team; teams
...ecognized as highly significant because a teams overall results can be more far-reachin...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 357, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... that almost all the teams some members didnt contribute much at all, but if the grou...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, third, well, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1373.03311258 135% => OK
No of words: 377.0 270.72406181 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92307692308 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58032521685 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 145.348785872 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535809018568 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.0417807955 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.769230769 110.228320801 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 21.698381199 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.504190736434 0.272083759551 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178547278548 0.0996497079465 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115178047113 0.0662205650399 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283827003374 0.162205337803 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104831881547 0.0443174109184 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.