In the lecture, the professor makes a series of points that cast doubt on all the arguments presented in the reading passage about the advantage of team work.The speaker illustrates his points with a research which has been done in a company and after the six months how well the work was done in teams of people were compared to indivitual work and the results of this research showed different results.
First of all,the proffesor states about free ride that was very common in every group project and some people in every group do not do work and take credit and also group as a whole get recognition not by every person and some people felt they were not seen in the group this counteradicted with the idea of the reading passage about the broader range of knowlege .
Secondly, the lecturer states the group work did not move quickly and they needed more meeting to reach a consent and it completely contradicte with the reading.
Lastly, the proffessor points out to the influencers in every group which basicly ignore others ideas in the group and converse to the reading that states people will shine in group influencer in group can convince the group for their idea and if the project fails the blame would be for all the members of the group.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 159, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...assage about the advantage of team work.The speaker illustrates his points with a r...
^^^
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... showed different results. First of all,the proffesor states about free ride that w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...sage about the broader range of knowlege . Secondly, the lecturer states the grou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, well, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33232144017 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 55.0 21.2450331126 259% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.3292342652 49.2860985944 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 259.0 110.228320801 235% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 55.5 21.698381199 256% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 16.25 7.06452816374 230% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330185051359 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186230230437 0.0996497079465 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575209111717 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186230230437 0.162205337803 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575209111717 0.0443174109184 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.3 13.3589403974 212% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 53.8541721854 60% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.4 11.0289183223 203% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 10.7273730684 247% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 24.0 10.498013245 229% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.