In the passage the author said that many organizations assign the project to group of people as a team. It's true many ideas will develop from the brain storming. There are a lot of chances to get new ideas than individual. Ideas will develop from the discussions. It's true that if project succeed the credit goes to whole team not to individual. But ultimately, organization needs completion of project on early and efficient basis.
In group team members will participate more actively, they always try to give best idea compare with other so the compatibility will be improved in between them. Personal appreciation very important for employees when they working in group it will create recognition to them. Every employ needs that to work efficiently. Mostly creative and risky solutions comes in group but, as a they can the challenge complete in efficient manner. In team new employees which are having less experience it's a opportunity to them to gain new knowledge to get 'shine'.
The lecture explained that person will not get recognition when they working in group. In a group or team there are different of people were there some people are workaholic and some are not. Because of this Some employees may disappoint that they work very hard but they didn't get proper recognition whole credit goes to team. With this they may not show proper interest to next project. So, here the lecture said that it's better to give individual task than group. Every one get chance to prove their talent and to grow professionally. Here credit goes to persons who are contributed their skills towards the project.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'give the best'.
Suggestion: give the best
...ipate more actively, they always try to give best idea compare with other so the compatib...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'solutions'' or 'solution's'?
Suggestion: solutions'; solution's
... efficiently. Mostly creative and risky solutions comes in group but, as a they can the c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a' or 'they'?
Suggestion: a; they
... risky solutions comes in group but, as a they can the challenge complete in efficient...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...loyees which are having less experience its a opportunity to them to gain new knowl...
^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...es which are having less experience its a opportunity to them to gain new knowled...
^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...point that they work very hard but they didnt get proper recognition whole credit goe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 503, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oup. Every one get chance to prove their talent and to grow professionally. Here ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93014705882 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65568193091 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522058823529 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.035026011 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.5 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1111111111 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.888888888889 7.06452816374 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 4.33554083885 300% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345093606685 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997019892162 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598394289129 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226349032084 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657450075646 0.0443174109184 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.