TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people

The article states that the best way to complete new project is to perfoem a team. However the professor explains none of the author's reasons are convincing and refutes them one-by-one.

To begin a group can work more quiekly. As the reading claims, is refuted by the professor. He assert that working as group takes more time than indivisual because if the members of group have different ideas, it takes much time for them to reach to unique idea.

In addition, according to essay team work have well effect on members, thet have enough time to shine. Nevertheless the professor argues that in one group there are some members that do not contribute in conversations and activities and when the work is finished, at the end others say that its done by team.

Finally, based on authors opinion, team can overcome to problems with wise solutions. On the contrary the professor shows that in team there are some persons that have more impact one others, if these members show their disagreement in one idea, that idea will be ignored.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article states that the best way to ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...plete new project is to perfoem a team. However the professor explains none of the auth...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vincing and refutes them one-by-one. To begin a group can work more quiekly. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'asserts'.
Suggestion: asserts
...claims, is refuted by the professor. He assert that working as group takes more time t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me for them to reach to unique idea. In addition, according to essay team wor...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'effected'.
Suggestion: effected
... according to essay team work have well effect on members, thet have enough time to sh...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...embers, thet have enough time to shine. Nevertheless the professor argues that in one group ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd others say that its done by team. Finally, based on authors opinion, team ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one other', 'an other', or simply 'others'?
Suggestion: one other; an other; others
... are some persons that have more impact one others, if these members show their disagreeme...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, in addition, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 1373.03311258 63% => OK
No of words: 179.0 270.72406181 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82681564246 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48196893262 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614525139665 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 419.366225166 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1211212193 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328985705726 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127595022597 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817995168615 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187308394353 0.162205337803 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792256130135 0.0443174109184 179% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.