TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people

The lecture and the reading discuss the idea of team work versus individual work . And while the reading passage is in favor of team work , the professor casts doubts on several key beliefs about favoring team work over individual work to achieve the required progress in a certain project as they presented in the reading passage.

To begin with , the reading claims, teamwork leads to faster results as group make risky decision that individual might not undertaken, as the responsibility in group is shared and no single can held accountability if the decision turns out to be wrong. However, in the lecture , the professor argues that in an experimental project in a company for six month , the decision was actually delayed because it took the team members longer time to agree on one decision and get consensus from everybody. Furthermore, the professor states that actually when the decision is the job of one or two individuals at most the decision maker takes shorter time to come up with the final opinion .

In addition , the lecture makes the argument that team members feel better about carrying out the work that is entailed by the decision the make themselves and not by the decision that is imposed on them by others which make them shine ! The lecturer totally counters this point by stating that influencers convince the rest of the group of their point of view despite their accuracy and other points of view might be ignored if not adopted by those influencers in the team which will make some members feel frustrated and disappointed specially when the decision taken by the group leads to failure at the end. Furthermore according to the professor, the individuals who don’t contribute enough in the project will get free credit if the project succeeds leaving the real contributors with not enough recognition or appreciation of their work .

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The lecture and the reading discuss the ...
^^^
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...idea of team work versus individual work . And while the reading passage is in fav...
^^
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...reading passage is in favor of team work , the professor casts doubts on several k...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey presented in the reading passage. To begin with , the reading claims, team...
^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the reading passage. To begin with , the reading claims, teamwork leads to f...
^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...out to be wrong. However, in the lecture , the professor argues that in an experim...
^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...perimental project in a company for six month , the decision was actually delayed bec...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ental project in a company for six month , the decision was actually delayed becau...
^^
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...r time to come up with the final opinion . In addition , the lecture makes th...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to come up with the final opinion . In addition , the lecture makes the argu...
^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ith the final opinion . In addition , the lecture makes the argument that tea...
^^
Line 5, column 615, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
... the group leads to failure at the end. Furthermore according to the professor, the individ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 851, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ecognition or appreciation of their work .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in addition, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 312.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98397435897 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70888709846 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516025641026 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 21.2450331126 207% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 151.809493936 49.2860985944 308% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 222.142857143 110.228320801 202% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.5714285714 21.698381199 205% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06452816374 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413057931698 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183756385204 0.0996497079465 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751122522621 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262500413552 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501703051935 0.0443174109184 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.3 13.3589403974 182% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.28 53.8541721854 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 11.0289183223 175% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.498013245 187% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.2008830022 179% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:

para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3

Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).

Don't need a conclusion paragraph.

Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster


Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.