The article states that there is doubts that whether some paintings attributed to Rambrandt were actually painted by him and one of them is a portrait of a woman's face. The reading provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that after a long examination it has been concluded that it is indeed the Rambrandt's work and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that there is something inconsistent about the way the woman in the portrait is dressed. The professor refutes this point by stating that in fact it was not a part of original painting. The fore-color was painted over the top of the painting one hundred years after the main painting was made. Someone probably wanted to increase the value of painting.
Second, the article claims that in this work light and shadow do not fit together. However, the professor contends that in the original painting woman is wearing a simple light colored dress. The light color reflects light that illuminates part of the woman's face. That's why the woman's face is not in partial shadow.
Third, the reading avers that examination of the back of the painting reveals that it was painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together. The lecture opposes this point by saying that the painting has been enlarged by pieces of wood on the top to make the painting greater and more valuable. So many pieces of original wooden panel are from the very same tree that Rambrandt used for his another painting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[3]
Message: Did you mean 'there are doubts'?
Suggestion: there are doubts
The article states that there is doubts that whether some paintings attributed ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...at illuminates part of the womans face. Thats why the womans face is not in partial s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, second, so, third, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83397683398 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41241997352 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498069498069 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0614960952 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4285714286 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392927326042 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130245007099 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989489958218 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238835537165 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462944427231 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.