Having revised both of the sources, the subject of the both passage and the lecture is about the most renowned of seventeent-century Dutch painter who is called Remrandt. Unlike the listening passage, the reading passage says that some painting of him do not prove that they are him because of several reasons.
Firstly, the reading passage says that the using of fur collar doesn't indicate attention of details of his painting, while the listening passage says that pigment of fur collar could destroy overtime because topic was before hundred years.
Secondly, unlike the lecture, the reading passage points out that Rembrandt was the best for mastering of painting light and shadow, but in here painting materials are not together which shows working is not him. The speaker, goes on to say, however, he used simple and light colour together. Face is not in shadow which is not a mistake.
Thirdly, in contrast to the speaker's point of view, the author points out that Rembrandt painted on wood panels but he did not use panel glued together any time. that's why some of picteres get out of Rembrandt's painting catalog. The proffesor reject this idea. The proffesor says that he add this in large scale and it was more valuable. He used panel glued together more ground
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 64, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ssage says that the using of fur collar doesnt indicate attention of details of his pa...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 226, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...stroy overtime because topic was before hundred years. Secondly, unlike the lecture, t...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thats
... not use panel glued together any time. thats why some of picteres get out of Rembran...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... not use panel glued together any time. thats why some of picteres get out of Rembran...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9212962963 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42061459138 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.6070434358 49.2860985944 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6363636364 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307786400268 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111531941136 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846651301736 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175779435233 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871147280004 0.0443174109184 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.