The lecture refuted the opinion raised in the reading that the portrait is was not drawn by Rembrandt.
Firstly, the pigment about the fur collar is not indeed the original collar. It was covered by another one to make it look more valuable and formal. The original woman did wear like a servant, so that is where the inconsistency come from.
Secondly, the light and shadow are the realistic one because the woman wears a light cloth that illuminated her face, so it looks bright rather than what the reading talk about. The portrait ‘s light and shadow fit well just like what Rembrandt will do.
Thirdly, the mystery of the panel consisting of the patches glued can also be solved the panel which was tested in the examination was not the one in the original. The panel was enlarged to make it more grand in size and valuable. The original one was a single type and it belongs to Rembrandt according to the history.
Finally, the wood was found be be the same tree of the other panels which belong to Rembrandt, like the “Self- Portrait with a hat.”
In conclusion,the portrait was painted by Rembrandt and the information which was checked out was not the original one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: VBZ_VBD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...raised in the reading that the portrait is was not drawn by Rembrandt. Firstly,...
^^
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...sed in the reading that the portrait is was not drawn by Rembrandt. Firstly, the...
^^^
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: grand
... The panel was enlarged to make it more grand in size and valuable. The original one was a si...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 29, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: be
...history. Finally, the wood was found be be the same tree of the other panels which...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...trait with a hat.' In conclusion,the portrait was painted by Rembrandt and t...
^^^^
Line 11, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s checked out was not the original one.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, look, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76076555024 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50411625141 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535885167464 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0181120652 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351149579356 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123155448302 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717181472148 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176241699681 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484722258227 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.