The reading passage is about Rembrandt who is most famous 17 century painter in Netherlands. Rembrandt have a unique style in painting. But many experts do not accept to this portrait painting by Rembrandt. On the other hand, lecturer have a similar opinion about this case.
First in the portraits to painted a woman, she is wearing a white linen, this type of dress was for servants while she is wear a coat to was dress of rich people, on the other hand lecturer explain about colors of portrait to use simple color and face in painting is not light shadow style. Rembrandt was famous with this style in painting.
Secondly Rembrandt painting on the wood to has one layer, but current painting is on glued wood that is multi-layer. In additionally lecturer says wood panel larger than single wood to Rembrandt painting on the it.
Finally, this proofs not synced together and on the opinions of art experts this portrait not painting by Rembrandt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'painter' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'painters'.
Suggestion: painters
...Rembrandt who is most famous 17 century painter in Netherlands. Rembrandt have a unique...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ntury painter in Netherlands. Rembrandt have a unique style in painting. But many ex...
^^^^
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Rembrandt) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ntury painter in Netherlands. Rembrandt have a unique style in painting. But many ex...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e a similar opinion about this case. First in the portraits to painted a woma...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... famous with this style in painting. Secondly Rembrandt painting on the wood ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 208, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...an single wood to Rembrandt painting on the it. Finally, this proofs not synce...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood to Rembrandt painting on the it. Finally, this proofs not synced together...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, second, secondly, while, as for, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 1373.03311258 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 165.0 270.72406181 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89090909091 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51457459612 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 145.348785872 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551515151515 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 419.366225166 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 70.2930374298 49.2860985944 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.496185355379 0.272083759551 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214847466457 0.0996497079465 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838065685766 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304267611674 0.162205337803 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04871729537 0.0443174109184 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 63.6247240618 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.